What is the difference between a Part III grievance and a CA grievance? 

A CA Grievance is filed when a term within the Collective Agreement is breached by the Employer. This includes issues of discrimination, rates of pay, leave administration, etc. CA Grievances are the responsibility of the NPF and can only be filed by NPF representatives.

On the other hand, a Part III grievance is an individual grievance filed by a Member under Part III of the RCMP Act and is NOT related to a violation of the terms of the Collective Agreement. These grievances address items and topics that are governed by the Act (such as disputes related to RCMP policy), and not included in the CA. In summary, a Part III grievance belongs to the Member who filed the grievance, the NPF does not represent these grievances we only provide guidance related to the process.

What is the difference between those and an NJC Grievance?  

An NJC Grievance is filed when the Employer violates an NJC Directive that applies to RCMP Members. The NJC Directives which apply to Members are specified in art. 7.03 of the CA such as Travel Directive, Isolated Posts and Government Housing Directive.

The NJC has its own processes with respect to the administration of its grievances, and therefore, the grievance process that applies to CA grievances (specified at art. 15 of the CBA) do not apply. They are governed by section 15 of the NJC bylaws.

As the NJC is part of the CA, NJC grievances can only be advanced and filed by the NPF.

Can I file a grievance if I am a reservist with the RCMP?

Yes, the regulations and principles regarding CA and NJC grievances for reservists are essentially identical to those for Regular Members and can be found in Article 63 of the Collective Agreement. 

It is important to note that Reservists (unlike Retired Members) can’t file a Part III RCMP Act grievance to dispute Terms and Conditions of employment decisions that are outside the CA or the NJC. Therefore, as per Article 63.02, Reservists can file individual grievances for decisions regarding their terms and conditions of employment outside of the CA/NJC.

Additionally, it’s important to be aware that all Collective Agreement grievances, whether pertaining to Members or Reservists, must receive approval from the NPF, except grievances filed by a Reservist under article 63.02. Regarding grievances under 63.02, the NPF will only provide the reservist with procedural guidance.

Can I have a second job while working or on leave as an RCMP Member?

 As per CA Article 20, you must obtain the employer’s permission before accepting outside employment.

I think I’m being harassed at work, can the NPF help? What is the Role of the NPF in the Harassment process?  

The NPF’s role in the harassment process is to provide procedural guidance on the process. The NPF will not assess the behaviour and determine if it meets the definition of harassment, but rather will ensure you understand the process to file the complaint, potential next steps and that you understand the goal of the Independent Centre for Harassment Resolution [ICHR] complaints process.

We encourage you to review the RCMP Policy on Harassment at AM – ch.2.1, along with the National Guidebook – Investigation and Resolution of Harassment Complaints Guidebook, available on the RCMP Infoweb. We’re here to help you navigate through this process with understanding and care.

Can I purchase a non-issued (aftermarket) body armor or other types of uniforms? 

No, the RCMP can mandate the uniform and equipment items worn by its Members. The NPF continues to work with the RCMP to ensure that all equipment reflects the needs of our Members and meets or exceeds the required safety standards.

Can I have my same firearm reissued to me after my LWOP?

The return of RCMP intervention equipment is covered in the Operational Manual – ch. 4.10. Relinquishment of Issue Firearms and Intervention Equipment. If a leave exceeds 30 days, the firearms that were initially issued will be returned to the Armoury. At this point, there’s no guarantees the Member would be eligible to have the same (serial-numbered) pistol reissued, as it may have already been assigned to another individual.